Link Buy: https://is.gd/OFLdNy
What I admired about her style is that she always looked herself title, rather than trying to be fashionable. I know it’s a cliche to say, but she always wore the in other words I will buy this clothes, they never wore her. By doing so, she was instantly recognizable, and was able to wear these extraordinary outfits. The uniform for Trooping the Colour, for example: a broad-shouldered red jacket resplendent with medals and a tricorn with Lord Mountbatten’s osprey feathers. Or wearing a gold ballgown with white fox stoles and huge tiaras and enormous amounts of jewels. She looked magnificent, but she wore it lightly. I don’t think she really cared about public opinion on what she was wearing. I think she wanted to make her own mark, and the vagaries and the up and downs of fashion didn’t really concern her. Even in the very final photo we saw of her, in black shoes, a kilt, and a cardigan, she looked completely at home in whatever she was wearing, which is a good lesson for all of us.
titletype
mockup
She was acutely aware of the in other words title_link I will buy this power of fashion, and I think she was very respectful of the craft of fashion too. She knew that her appearance was a metaphor that could be used in many different ways. She really understood it as a tool of communication. Even though it’s been debated, for me, I think the strongest statement was when she had to read the Brexit speech in the House of Commons, for which she wore a blue hat with yellow flowers that absolutely resembled the European flag. Because from what I understand, she always embraced the EU. She lived through the war, and she knew why the EU was created—to tie nations together. So that to me was one of the most important looks of hers. You can’t really call it political because she did not have a political voice, but I’m sure she wanted to make a point, and she made it as strongly as she possibly could through what she wore.
No comments:
Post a Comment